Are we really reducing global poverty?

نویسنده

  • Jan Vandemoortele
چکیده

Some of the global norms, facts and findings on poverty have l ed to two incorrect conclusions: that good progress is being made towards the target of halving global poverty by 2015, and that aggregate economic growth is the best way for reducing it further. The paper questions whether $1 per day is a valid poverty norm, whether poverty trends for China are an enigma; and whether statistical validity can be mistaken for truth. It draws the attention to the risk of 'misplaced concreteness' in economic analyses. It emphasises that equity matters for poverty reduction, based on the argument that if growth is good for the poor but if high inequality inhibits growth—as most analysts now agree—then equity must be good for the poor. Indeed, equity does matter for poverty reduction. It would be incorrect to assume that more growth will automatically translate into less poverty. Equity concerns are not about charity, but about laying the foundation for a strong economy and a just society. The fact that the poor do not gain from economic stagnation and recession does not prove—regrettably—that the opposite will be true. The fact that macroeconomic instability hurts the poor does not necessarily mean that macroeconomic stability will benefit the poor. Much will depend on how stability is achieved. More nuanced positions and conclusions are warranted, given the many complexities that govern the relationship between growth and poverty. The paper also argues that if robust economic growth in places as far apart as South Asia and Latin America does not significantly reduce income-poverty, then there is a strong case for social policy to ensure that growth leads to rapid poverty reduction. Social safety nets allow for a rapid response to crises but they are not sufficient as social shock absorber. They claim to be efficient, which does not necessarily imply they are effective. There is no doubt that public spending on social services includes wastage; but those who argue that existing budgets have to be used more efficiently before investing more public money miss the important point that insufficiencies often create inefficiencies. The dichotomy between more money versus more efficiency is a false one. Most policy-makers do not face a choice between either improving efficiency or increasing budget allocations; both have to be addressed simultaneously. Indeed, inefficiencies and insufficiencies are not independent, but very much interdependent. A social shock absorber should not be dismissed on the …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Thinking Out of the Box: A Green and Social Climate Fund; Comment on “Politics, Power, Poverty and Global Health: Systems and Frames”

Solomon Benatar’s paper “Politics, Power, Poverty and Global Health: Systems and Frames” examines the inequitable state of global health challenging readers to extend the discourse on global health beyond conventional boundaries by addressing the interconnectedness of planetary life. Our response explores existing models of international cooperation, assessing how modifying them may achieve the...

متن کامل

History, Structure and Agency in Global Health Governance; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”

Ilona Kickbusch’s thought provoking editorial is criticized in this commentary, partly because she fails to refer to previous critical work on the global conditions and policies that sustain inequality, poverty, poor health and damage to the biosphere and, as a result, she misreads global power and elides consideration of the fundamental historical structures of political and material power tha...

متن کامل

Reducing global poverty through universal primary and secondary education

The eradication of poverty and the provision of equitable and inclusive quality education for all are two intricately linked Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As this year’s High Level Political Forum focuses on prosperity and poverty reduction, this paper, jointly released by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) and the Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report, shows why education is ...

متن کامل

What Really Matters: Living Longer or Living Healthier; Comment on “Shanghai Rising: Health Improvements as Measured by Avoidable Mortality Since 2000”

The decline in Avoidable Mortality (AM) and increase in life expectancy in Shanghai is impressive. Gusmano and colleagues suggested that Shanghai’s improved health system has contributed significantly to this decline in AM. However, when compared to other global cities, Shanghai’s life expectancy at birth is improving as London and New York City, but has yet to surpass that of Hong Kong, Tokyo,...

متن کامل

Impact of Microfinance : A Critical Survey

According to the United Nations (UN), in 2002 almost one-fifth of the world population (i e, 1.3 billion people) was living in extreme poverty, earning less than one dollar a day. In recent public debates microfinance has been mentioned as an important instrument to combat poverty. Therefore, microfinance has received a lot of attention, both from policy-makers as well as in academic circles. E...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003